Original Research
Factors associated with the inflammatory immune response induced by COVID-19 vaccines among adults
Mohammed S. Alzawam and Fatimah O. Hasan
Abstract
In efforts to counteract the COVID-19 pandemic, several vaccines have been developed. Despite their efficacy, they are not without adverse immune reactions that may occur among populations according to various factors. The purpose of this study was to explore some factors that are associated with the inflammatory immune response induced by COVID-19 vaccines among the Libyans. This analytical study was performed on recorded data for 410 individuals who received three different COVID-19 vaccines (Sinovac, AstraZeneca-Oxford and Sputnik-V) that were retrieved from the previous study on December 2nd, 2023. Among 410 Libyan adults, 404 cases were enrolled for the final analysis, 56.7% (CI 95%, 52.0 - 61.1) of the vaccinated experienced systemic inflammatory reactions. Wherein, Sinovac vaccine recipients were more likely to experience inflammatory reactions compared to AstraZeneca-Oxford vaccine recipients with a high significant (2MH = 38.344, P = 0.001) adjusted odds ratio equal to 5.234 (CI 95%, 3.034 - 9.029). After controlling for confounding factors, age, gender and comorbidity were found to significantly associated risk factors with an inflammatory response among AstraZeneca-Oxford vaccine recipients (P = 0.001, P = 0.021 and P = 0.002, respectively). Whereas comorbidity was only one of the significantly increased risk factors associated with the occurrence of inflammatory events among Sinovac vaccine recipients (2 = 7.507, P = 0.006). In conclusion, age, gender, comorbidity and type of vaccine were found to be significant risk factors for the occurrence of inflammatory events induced by vaccines. Further studies with larger sample size and the inclusion of laboratory parameters such as C-reactive protein and alpha-1-acid glycoprotein along with antibodies are needed.
Introduction
Several vaccines have been developed with different biological and pharmaceutical ingredients utilizing various technologies in order to counteract the COVID-19 pandemic [1]. Adenovirus vectors are one of the delivery techniques that are used in authorized COVID-19 vaccines. Different types are used such as chimpanzee adenovirus Y25 that is used in the AstraZeneca-Oxford COVID-19 vaccine and two recombinant human adenoviruses (ad26 and ad5) that are used in the production of the Sputnik-V vaccine [2 - 5]. In addition, the fact that pre-existing immunity against the adenovirus vectors is a special feature of this type of vaccine as well as the ability to induce immune responses against the vector particles which can impair the response to the vaccine antigen and that may play a role in the immune response against booster doses of the COVID-19 vaccines [1, 6 - 10].
Chinese CoronaVac (Sinovac) is an
authorized COVID-19 vaccine made up of virus particles that are being grown in
Vero cells and inactivated by beta-propiolactone (BPL) to lose their ability to
cause disease while still inducing an inflammatory response against S proteins
[11 - 13]. The Sinovac vaccine is produced through several steps of virus
purification, yielding a final product that primarily contains viral proteins
and is composed of nearly pure viral particles [14 - 15]. Consequently, the
quality and variations in the efficacy observed in the studies which are
believed to be caused by altering the ratios of pre-fusion and post-fusion
conformations of S proteins as a result of variation in production steps [1, 16].
Unlike genetic vaccines that are referred to as being self-adjuvant because
they have the potential to induce innate responses, protein-based vaccines such
as inactivated whole-virus vaccines are typically unable to induce a sufficient
immune response on their own and require adjuvant, as a result, an aluminum
hydroxide substance is used with the Sinovac vaccine to enhance the immune
response [11, 17 - 20].
Even
though the effectiveness of the vaccines in limiting COVID-19's spread as
well as reducing the risk of complications and even death [21 - 24]. Like other
vaccines, they are not without adverse reactions that may vary in prevalence
among population according to various factors [25 - 27]. Which are not limited to factors that are
related to the vaccine itself (i.e., brand, dose, type and adjuvant used) but
there are several other factors such as intrinsic characteristics (i.e., age, gender,
ethnicity and comorbidity) and delivery factors (i.e., injection route) that
may influence the generation of the immune response and, therefore, the safety
and effectiveness of the vaccines [1, 23 - 25]. Consequently, there is a need to investigate
factors associated with the inflammatory immune response stimulated by
COVID-19 among individuals in Libyan population [28]. As a result, this study
aimed to explore certain factors that are associated with the inflammatory
immune response induced by COVID-19 vaccines in Libya.
Materials and methods
Study
design and data retrieval: This
analytical study was performed on recorded data for 410 individuals who
received the first dose of one of the three COVID-19 vaccines (Sinovac,
AstraZeneca-Oxford or Sputnik-V). The data included demographic variables (age
and gender), clinical profile (comorbidity and history of COVID-19 incidence),
vaccine received and reactogenicity which were retrieved from the previous published
study [28].
Data analysis: The data were analyzed using
the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26. Descriptive
statistic was carried out using percentage and frequency representing in tables
after discretizing the continuous variable with the entropy-MDL algorithm using
Orange software version 3.33.0. Fisher's exact and Chi-square tests at a significant
level of P < 0.05 were used to find the associated risk for developing
inflammatory immune reactions. 95% confidence intervals of the risk ratio and
adjusted odds ratio for measuring effect size as well as the Mantel-Haenszel and
Breslow-Day tests for measuring association with controlling confounding
factors were calculated [29].
Results
Baseline characteristics of the data:
Among the 410 individuals, six cases
that had only local events were excluded while the remaining cases were
enrolled for final analysis (n = 404). Table 1 demonstrates the baseline
characteristics of the individuals based on the vaccine received, wherein, the
percentage of AstraZeneca-Oxford vaccine recipients was 56.2% followed by the
percentage of Sinovac and Sputnik-V vaccine recipients which were 34.9% and 08.9%,
respectively. In general, 83.4% (CI 95%, 80.0 - 86.6) of the cases were within
the range of 18 to 61 years of age. In addition, 53.5% (CI 95%, 48.6 - 57.9) of
overall cases were females. Furthermore, 23.0% (CI 95%, 19.3 - 27.0) of the cases
had at least one chronic disease and a total of 56.7% (CI 95%, 52.0 - 61.1) of
those vaccinated were reported with at least one systemic inflammatory
response, since only 04.7% (CI 95%, 3.0 - 6.4) of the cases had the COVID-19
disease.
Table 1:
Baseline characteristics
of COVID-19 vaccines recipients
|
Vaccines |
Total |
CI 95% |
|
|||||
AstraZeneca |
Sputnik-V |
Sinovac |
Lower |
Upper |
|||||
Adverse Effects |
No |
132 (58.1%) |
20 (55.6%) |
023 (16.3%) |
175 (43.3%) |
38.9 |
48.0 |
|
|
Yes |
095 (41.9%) |
16 (44.4%) |
118 (83.7%) |
229 (56.7%) |
52.0 |
61.1 |
|
||
Gender |
Male |
113 (49.8%) |
16 (44.4%) |
059 (41.8%) |
188 (46.5%) |
42.1 |
51.2 |
|
|
Female |
114 (50.2%) |
20 (55.6%) |
082 (58.2%) |
216 (53.5%) |
48.6 |
57.9 |
|
||
Age in Years |
18 - 61 |
176 (77.5%) |
33 (91.7%) |
128 (90.8%) |
337 (83.4%) |
80.0 |
86.6 |
|
|
> 61 |
051 (22.5%) |
03 (08.3%) |
013 (09.2%) |
067 (16.6%) |
13.4 |
20.0 |
|
||
In. with COVID19 |
No |
221 (97.4%) |
35 (97.2%) |
129 (91.5%) |
385 (95.3%) |
93.3 |
97.0 |
|
|
Yes |
006 (02.6%) |
01 (02.8%) |
012 (08.5%) |
019 (04.7%) |
03.0 |
06.4 |
|
||
Comorbidity |
No |
189 (83.3%) |
28 (77.8%) |
094 (66.7%) |
311 (77.0%) |
73.0 |
80.9 |
|
|
Yes |
038 (16.7%) |
08 (22.2%) |
047 (33.3%) |
093 (23.0%) |
19.3 |
27.0 |
|
||
Total |
227 (56.2%) |
36 (08.9%) |
141 (34.9%) |
404 (100%) |
|
|
|||
Confidence
interval level of 95% was calculated with Bias-corrected and accelerated
(BCa)
method based on 10000 bootstrap samples.
Inflammatory
reactions and demographic characteristics: The risk of an
inflammatory reaction among the individual group of 18 to 61 years of age who
received the AstraZeneca-Oxford vaccine was 2.951 (CI 95%, 1.557 - 5.590) as
high as the risk of inflammatory events among their older counterparts (Figure
1). The value of the Mantel-Haenszel test demonstrated that after adjusting
for gender and comorbidity, age was associated with the inflammatory reactions
generated against the vaccine (c2MH
= 14.555,
P = 0.001). Wherein, the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) indicates that these
individuals (18 to 61 years of age) had 4.799 times (CI 95%, 2.106 - 10.933)
the odds of experiencing inflammatory events than their older counterparts (
> 61 years old) with homogeneous odds ratios across each stratum (c2BD
= 1.089, df = 03, P = 0.780). Regarding gender, 40.0% of
AstraZeneca-Oxford vaccine recipients who experienced inflammatory reactions
were males, who had 0.673 times (CI 95%, 0.490 - 0.924) the risk of an
inflammatory response (a 32.7% decrease in risk) compared to the female subjects
(Figure 1). The adjustment for age and comorbidity revealed that gender
was significantly associated with the inflammatory response stimulated by the
vaccine (c2MH
= 5.292, P = 0.021). Hence, female subjects had a higher AOR to experience
inflammatory events following AstraZeneca-Oxford 2.031 times (CI 95%, 1.151 - 3.583)
than their male counterparts with a homogeneous odds ratio across each stratum
(c2
BD = 1.362, df = 03,
P = 0.715). On the other hand, age and gender were not significantly associated
with the inflammatory response among the Sputnik-V and Sinovac vaccine
recipients (Figure 1).
Figure
1:
Comparison of the risk of experiencing inflammatory reactions induced by
COVID-19 vaccines.
The figure shows
the risk ratio with an upper and lower bound for the COVID-19 vaccines
recipients experiencing an inflammatory reaction and their relationships with
the major factors, whereas Fisher's exact and Chi-square tests were used to
calculate the P-value with a significant level of 0.05.
Inflammatory
reactions and medical anamneses: Although the comorbidity was significantly
associated with the inflammatory response induced by each of the
AstraZeneca-Oxford (c2
= 4.828, P = 0.028) and Sinovac vaccines (c2 = 7.507, P =
0.006). Wherein, for each of the AstraZeneca-Oxford and Sinovac vaccines, the
risk of experiencing inflammatory events among individuals in a good health was
0.667 (CI 95%, 0.482 - 0.924) and 0.811 (CI 95%, 0.716 - 0.918) times as high
as the risk of experiencing inflammatory events compared to individuals with
one or more chronic illnesses (a 33.3% and 18.9% decrease in risk,
respectively) (Figure 1). Additionally, age and gender adjustment
revealed that AstraZeneca-Oxford recipients with chronic illnesses had an AOR
3.730 (CI 95%, 1.638 - 8.496) times higher than their counterparts without
chronic illnesses with a significant association between comorbidity and
inflammatory reactions induced by the vaccine (c2MH =
9.360, P = 0.002) in which the odds ratios were homogeneous (c2BD
= 0.185, df = 03, P = 0.980). Whereas, there was not a significant association
between stimulated inflammatory reactions and a certain chronic illness that
involved: diabetes mellitus (14.6%), cardiovascular disease (07.4%),
respiratory disorders (01.7%) and others (02.5%), or certain medications:
anti-hyperglycemic drugs (14.4%), cardiovascular drugs (07.2%), anti-inflammatory
drugs (03.5%) and others (02.0%) for each vaccine. Moreover, that inflammatory
response was not statistically associated with the previous incidence of COVID-19
disease for each vaccine.
Inflammatory reactions and type of vaccine: The results demonstrated considering the recipients of
the AstraZeneca-Oxford vaccine as a reference group, the risk ratio for the
reference group was 0.500 (CI 95%, 0.422 - 0.593) times as high as the risk of
experiencing inflammatory events than the recipients of the Sinovac vaccine which
was statistically significant (c2 = 62.448, P = 0.000) (Figure 1). The common odds ratio indicated that after adjusting
for age, gender and comorbidity, the recipients of the Sinovac vaccine had
5.234 (CI 95%, 3.034 - 9.029) times the odds of experiencing inflammatory
reactions compared to the reference group, which was statistically significant
(c2MH = 38.344, P =
0.000) with a homogeneous odds ratio across each stratum (c2BD = 3.479, df =
07, P = 0.837). Whereas, the risk ratio of experiencing inflammatory events in
the reference group compared to Sputnik-V vaccine recipients was not
statistically significant.
Discussion
The present study revealed that among Libyan adult subjects, about half of those vaccinated experienced at least one systemic inflammatory reaction, since 83.4% of the total individuals were under the age of 60 years and 77.0% of the recipients of the vaccines had one or more chronic diseases, in which age, gender and comorbidity were found to be significant risk factors for the occurrence of inflammatory events in AstraZeneca-Oxford vaccine recipients, wherein, in these individuals, females and those with at least one chronic illness were more likely to experience inflammatory events after receiving the AstraZeneca-Oxford vaccine. The present findings are in line with Almufty et al.'s findings [26] which suggested that young age, females and comorbidity are significant risk factors for experiencing adverse reactions. Menni and others [30] have also confirmed that age, gender and comorbidity are associated with experiencing adverse events.
Although the study of Alemayehu et al. [31] which was performed in Eastern Ethiopia on AstraZeneca-Oxford vaccine recipients indicated adverse events are significantly higher in the age group of 50 - 60 years old with one or more chronic illnesses than their counterparts. However, the present study contradicted the findings that indicated males are more likely to develop symptoms than female subjects. As well as, Al Bahrani et al. [32] have conducted at the King Fahad Military Medical Complex, Dhahran, during the vaccination campaign in the KSA suggested older individuals and male subjects are more likely to report adverse reactions compared to their female counterparts. These contract findings could have resulted from ethnic differences in the study populations and the Adenovirus-vector used in the vaccine which could also have triggered different immunological reactions that require further investigations [1, 25].Regarding Sinovac vaccines, comorbidity
was the only significant risk factor associated with experiencing an
inflammatory event. This finding contrasts studies done by Riad et al. [27] in
Turkey among health care workers, Abbas et al. [33] in Pakistan at the
Foundation University College of Dentistry, Islamabad and Nurzak et al. [34] that
was conducted in December 2021 at the public health center of Marosn, South
Sulawesi, Indonesia, which suggested age, gender and the previous incidence of
COVID-19 were significantly associated with an increased risk of inflammatory
events. This observation was unclear and requires further studies, as this
study had limitations represented by the relatively small sample size and the
fact that the study was predominated by individuals without a history of
incidence of COVID-19 disease. Therfore, more studies with a large sample size and a better
infected-to-uninfected COVID-19 disease ratio to investigate the factors
associated with the inflammatory reactions including laboratory parameters such
as C-reactive protein and alpha-1-acid glycoprotein along with antibodies are needed.
Conclusion: Sinovac vaccine recipients were more likely to
experience inflammatory reactions compared to the other vaccines. Age, gender, comorbidity and type of vaccine were the risk factors associated with the occurrence of
inflammatory events induced by vaccines that should be considered.
References
1.
Heinz FX, Stiasny K (2021)
Distinguishing features of current COVID-19 vaccines: knowns and unknowns of
antigen presentation and modes of action. NPJ Vaccines. 6 (1): 1-13. doi: 10.1038/s41541-021-00369-6.
2.
Logunov DY, Dolzhikova IV, Zubkova
OV, Tukhvatullin AI, Shcheblyakov DV, Dzharullaeva AS, Grousova DM,
Erokhova AS, Kovyrshina AV, Botikov AG, Izhaeva FM, Popova O, Ozharovskaya TA,
Borisevich SV, Naroditsky BS, Gintsburg AL (2020) Safety and immunogenicity of
an rAd26 and rAd5 vector-based heterologous prime-boost COVID-19 vaccine in two
formulations: two open, non-randomised phase 1/2 studies from Russia. The
Lancet. 396 (10255): 887-897. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31866-3.
3.
van Doremalen N, Lambe T, Spencer
A, Belij-Rammerstorfer S, Purushotham JN, Port JR, Avanzato
VA, Bushmaker
T, Flaxman
A, Ulaszewska
M, Feldmann
F, Allen
ER, Sharpe
H, Schulz
J, Holbrook
M, Okumura
A, Meade-White
K, Pérez-Pérez
L, Edwards
NJ, Wright
D, Bissett
C, Gilbride
C, Williamson
BN, Rosenke
R, Long
D, Ishwarbhai
A, Kailath
R, Rose
L, Morris
S, Powers
C, Lovaglio
J, Hanley
PW, Scott
D, Saturday
G, de Wit
E, Gilbert
SC, Munster
VJ (2020)
ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine prevents SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in rhesus macaques.
Nature. 586 (7830): 578-582. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2608-y.
4.
Voysey M, Clemens SAC, Madhi SA,
Weckx LY, Folegatti PM, Aley PK, Vekemans J, Villafana TL, Watson MEE, Williams CJ, Douglas AD,
Hill AVS, Lambe T, Gilbert SC, Pollard AJ (2021) Safety
and efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (AZD1222) against SARS-CoV-2: an
interim analysis of four randomised controlled trials in Brazil, South Africa,
and the UK. The Lancet. 397 (10269): 99-111. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32661-1.
5.
Logunov DY, Dolzhikova IV,
Shcheblyakov DV, Tukhvatulin AI, Zubkova OV, Dzharullaeva AS, Kovyrshina AV,
Lubenets NL, Grousova DM, Erokhova AS, Botikov AG, Izhaeva FM, Popova AG,
Ozharovskaya TA, Zyranov SK, Borisevich SV, Ginsburg AL (2021) Safety
and efficacy of an rAd26 and rAd5 vector-based heterologous prime-boost
COVID-19 vaccine: an interim analysis of a randomised controlled phase 3 trial
in Russia. The Lancet. 397 (10275): 671-681. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00234-8.
6.
McCoy K, Tatsis N, Korioth-Schmitz
B, Lasaro MO, Hensley SE, Lin S-W, Li
Y, Giles-Davis W, Cun A, Zhou D, Xiang Z, Letvin NL, Ertl HCJ (2007) Effect
of preexisting immunity to adenovirus human serotype 5 antigens on the immune
responses of nonhuman primates to vaccine regimens based on human- or
chimpanzee-derived adenovirus vectors. Journal of Virology. 81 (12): 6594-6604. doi: 10.1128/jvi.02497-06.
7.
Lasaro MO, Ertl HCJ (2009) New
insights on adenovirus as vaccine vectors. Molecular Therapy. 17
(8): 1333-1339. doi: 10.1038/mt.2009.130.
8.
Barouch, Kik, Weverling, Dilan, King, Maxfield, Clark, Ng'ang'a D, Brandariz KL, Abbink, Sinangil, de Bruyn,Gray, Roux,Bekker, Dilraj, Kibuuka H, Robb, Michael NL, Anzala, Amornkul, Gilmour, Hural, Buchbinder, Seaman, Dolin R, Baden, Carville, Mansfield, Pau, Goudsmit
J (2011) International seroepidemiology of
adenovirus serotypes 5, 26, 35, and 48 in pediatric and adult populations.
Vaccine. 29 (32): 5203-5209. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.05.025.
9.
Fausther-Bovendo H, Kobinger GP (2014)
Pre-existing immunity against Ad vectors. Human Vaccines and
Immunotherapeutics. 10 (10): 2875-2884. doi: 10.4161/hv.29594.
10. Capone S, D’Alise AM, Ammendola V, Colloca S, Cortese R, Nicosia A, Folgori
A (2013) Development of chimpanzee adenoviruses as vaccine vectors: Challenges
and successes emerging from clinical trials. Expert Review of Vaccines. 12 (4): 379-393. doi: 10.1586/erv.13.15.
11. Hotez PJ, Bottazzi ME (2022) Whole inactivated virus and protein-based COVID-19
vaccines. Annual
Review of Medicine. 73 (1): 55-64. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-042420-113212.
12. Hadj Hassine I (2021) COVID-19 vaccines and variants of concern: Reviews in Medical Virology. 32 (4): 1-16. doi: 10.1002/rmv.2313.
13. Khoshnood S, Arshadi M, Akrami S, Koupaei M, Ghahramanpour H, Shariati A, Sadehifard
N, Heidary H (2022) An overview on inactivated and live-attenuated SARS-CoV-2
vaccines. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis. 36 (5): 1-12. doi:
10.1002/jcla.24418.
14. Zhang
Y, Zeng G, Pan H, Li C, Hu Y, Chu K, Han W, Chen Z, Tang R, Yin W, Chen X, Hu
Y, Liu X, Jiang C, Jingxin L, Yang M, Song Y, Wang X, Gao Q, Zhu F (2021) Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of an inactivated
SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in healthy adults aged 18-59 years: a randomised,
double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 clinical trial. The Lancet
Infectious Diseases. 21 (2): 181-192. doi:
10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30843-4.
15. Xia S, Duan K, Zhang Y, Zhao D, Zhang H, Xie Z, Li X, Peng C, Zhang Y,
Zhang W, Yang Y, Chen, Gao, You, Wang, Wang, Shi, Wang, Yang, Zhang, Huang, Wang, Lu, Yang, Guo, Zhou, Wan, Wu, Wang, Huang, Du, Meng, Pan, Yuan, Shuo Shen, Guo, Xiaoming Yang(2020) Effect of an inactivated vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 on
safety and immunogenicity outcomes: interim analysis of 2 randomized clinical
trials. Journal of
the American Medical Association. 324 (10): 951-960.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.15543.
16. Dyer O (2021) COVID-19: Chinese vaccines may need changes to improve
efficacy, admits official. BMJ. 373: n969.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.n969.
17. Pardi N, Hogan MJ, Porter FW, Weissman D (2018) mRNA vaccines-a new era in
vaccinology. Nature
Reviews Drug Discovery. 17 (4): 261-279. doi:
10.1038/nrd.2017.243.
18. Kowalczyk A, Doener F, Zanzinger K, Noth J, Baumhof P, Fotin-Mleczek M, Heidenreich
R (2016) Self-adjuvanted mRNA vaccines induce local innate immune responses
that lead to a potent and boostable adaptive immunity. Vaccine. 34 (33): 3882-3893.
doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.05.046.
19. Huang Q, Yan J (2021) SARS-CoV-2 virus: vaccines in development. Fundamental Research. 1 (2): 131-138. doi: 10.1016/j.fmre.2021.01.009.
20. Hofman K, Shenoy GN, Chak V, Balu-Iyer SV (2021) Pharmaceutical aspects
and clinical evaluation of COVID-19 vaccines. Immunological Investigations. 50
(7): 743-779. doi: 10.1080/08820139.2021.1904977.
21. Mallapaty BS, Callaway E, Kozlov M, Ledford H, Noorden R Van (2021) How
COVID vaccines shaped 2021 in eight powerful charts. Nature. 600 (7890): 580-583. doi:
10.1038/d41586-021-03686-x.
22. Watson OJ, Barnsley G, Toor J, Hogan AB, Winskill P, Ghani AC (2022)
Global impact of the first year of COVID-19 vaccination: a mathematical
modelling study. The
Lancet Infectious Diseases. 3099 (22): 1-10.
doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00320-6.
23. Feikin DR, Higdon MM, Abu-Raddad LJ, Andrews N, Araos R, Goldberg Y, Groome
Nj, Huppert A, O'Brain KL, Smith PG, Wilder-smith A, Zeger S, Knoll MD, Patel
MK (2022) Duration of effectiveness of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 infection
and COVID-19 disease: results of a systematic review and meta-regression. The
Lancet. 399 (10328): 924-944. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00152-0.
24. Jara A, Undurraga EA, González C, Paredes F, Fontecilla T, Jara G, Pizarro
A, Acevedo J, Leo K, Leon F, Sans, Leighton, Suárez, García-Escorza, Araos(2021)
Effectiveness of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in Chile. The New England Journal of Medicine. 385 (10): 875-884. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa2107715.
25. Hervé C, Laupèze B, Del Giudice G, Didierlaurent AM, Da Silva FT (2019) The how’s and what’s of vaccine
reactogenicity. npj Vaccines. 4 (1): 39. doi: 10.1038/s41541-019-0132-6.
26. Almufty HB, Mohammed SA, Abdullah AM, Merza MA (2021) Potential adverse
effects of COVID19 vaccines among Iraqi population; a comparison between the
three available vaccines in Iraq; a retrospective cross-sectional study.
Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research and Reviews. 15 (5): 102207.
doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2021.102207.
27. Riad A, Sağıroğlu D, Üstün B, Pokorná A, Klugarová J, Attia S, Klugar M
(2021) Prevalence and risk factors of coronavac side effects: An independent cross-sectional
study among healthcare workers in Turkey. Journal
of Clinical Medicine. 10 (12): 2629. doi: 10.3390/jcm10122629.
28. Al-Zawam MS,
Abuleid KM, Al-Zawam MS, Ashour RA (2022)
Prevalence of reactogenicity of COVID-19 vaccine among Libyan adults: a cross -
sectional study. Mediterranean Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical
Sciences. 2 (4): 48-53. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7479756.
29. Fidalgo ÁM (2005) Mantel-Haenszel methods. Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral
science. 3: 1120-1126.
ISBN: 9780470860809. doi.org/10.1002/0470013192.bsa364.
30. Menni C, Klaser K, May A, Polidori L, Capdevila J, Louca P, Sudre CH,
Nguyen LH, Drew DA, MMerino, Hu, Selvachandran, Antonelli,
Murray B, Canas LS, Molteni E, Joshi, Mangino, Hammers, Goodman, Chan, Wolf, Steves CJ, Valdes AM, Ourselin, Spector(2021) Vaccine
side-effects and SARS-CoV-2 infection after vaccination in users of the COVID symptom
study app in the UK: a prospective observational study. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 21 (7): 939-949. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00224-3.
31. Alemayehu A, Demissie A, Yusuf M, Abdullahi Y, Abdulwehab R, Oljira L, Feleke
D (2022) COVID-19 vaccine side effect: age and gender disparity in adverse
effects following the first dose of AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine among the
vaccinated population in Eastern Ethiopia: a community-based study. SAGE Open
Medicine. 10: 1-9. doi: 10.1177/20503121221108616.
32. Al Bahrani S, Albarrak A, Alghamdi OA, Alghamdi MA, Hakami FH, Al Abaadi
AK, Alkhrashi, Alghamdi, Almershad, Alenazi, El Gezery, Jebakumar, Al-Tawfiq(2021) Safety and reactogenicity of the ChAdOx1 (AZD1222)
COVID-19 vaccine in Saudi Arabia.
International Journal of Infectious Diseases.
110: 359-362. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.07.052.
33. Abbas S, Abbas B, Amir S, Wajahat M (2021) Evaluation of adverse effects
with COVID-19 vaccination in Pakistan. Pakistan
Journal of Medical Sciences. 37 (7): 1959-1964.
doi: 10.12669/pjms.37.7.4522.
34. Nurzak AN, Iqbal M, Yunus A, Wahyuni DF (2022) The evaluation of adverse effects
of Sinovac® COVID-19 vaccine after receiving the first dose - Maros Health
Center, December 2021. Journal
of Pharmaceutical Negative Results. 13 (01): 78-83.
doi: 10.47750/pnr.2022.13.S01.10.
Citation :
Alzawam & Hasan (2023) Factors associated with the inflammatory immune response induced by COVID-19 vaccines among adults. Mediterr J Pharm Pharm Sci. 3 (1): 11-17. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7771333.